You know what I don't like?

Status
Not open for further replies.

BugGirl

Wommin of Legions
I hate when people straw man (VERBING THE NOUN YO) a belief to try to make the people who've actually thought these things through, and seriously aren't just bumbling sheep who'll believe whatever you throw at them, look stupid.
Yes, we believe different things! Crazy, right? Does the fact that I believe this, and you believe that, have anything to do with how we should treat each other? Maybe if I were killing people! But I'm not, so deal with it. I believe in an invisible sky god. And I have my reasons. Don't make it an issue.
 

Gheist

King of all Goblins
[...] O and Gheist, I've been watching our friend ever since his first post on the forums. I believe this is the first time he's brought up a religious topic [...]
Assuming that you're talking about Allahrules2, there've been quite a few posts, tangents, or entire threads that have been removed either by himself (like everything he posted on this topic in here for example) or by moderators.

And on topic of religious/areligious beliefs:
religion-is-like-a-keep-it-inside-11297-1283509798-5.jpg
 
I hate it how one
Parent:Son you must tell the truth all the time.
A couple of days Later
Parent blames son for smashing a valuable item
Son tells the truth. He didn't break it
But what does the parent do? Doesn't belive him
Never say tell the truth if you don't want to hear it.
 
I

IzRaPiDz

Guest
I hate how people say they are leaving legions for good and they come back the day after. Legions is TOO addictive damn it!
Well, i guess i'm back but i'll not be too active. Like i said i made my self look an idiot. Lol mate
 

Immanent

Member
Yeah, people get really touchy when it's about politics and religions. I've noticed that you can't talk about either of those with someone who thinks different then you so I don't do it.
Hey disci to set the record straight:


Allahrules2 said:
I still don't understand why you would find it offensive​
Immanent said:
To be honest, it's not best to involve religion, that's just my experiences with online forums and stuff. People get too icky and start to throw metaphorical poot at each other.
Also the "rules" part of your name may be taken the wrong way by people. juss saying.

Disci said:
I'll try to explain it to you one more time, but this time I'll make it really simple. If mods haven't changed your nick name by now, it's ok. Those who finds it offensive are cunts who has too *dancing* much time to bitch about pretty much everything. These people who has criticized your nick name so far are childrens, they have no idea about anything. If you think your nick name is ok, just keep it then. Ignore all the dumb piece of *chocolate cookies* members on these boards. It's internet for crying out loud.

One another thing. If you name yourself as "Allahrules2" but you don't want people to call you as that, then why did you name yourself like that?
 

OmniNept

Actionaut
thedisaster said:
besides you have no proof that religion is ignorance

Coincidentally, confirmation bias is another means through which people hide from the world: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

You've cast far too wide a net, and the myriad of counter examples necessitates some quick and lazy Wikipedia links. If you're unsatisfied with those, then I direct you to the source material (at the bottom of each article). Most of the publications seem sound.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Earth

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oblate_spheroid

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric_dating

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocentric_model

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_revolution

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_AIDS

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_exceptionalism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sex_abuse_cases

And from the Omniscient forums (Just-World Hypothesis - believed by many religions):
“Melvin Lerner (1980) argues that the tendency to be critical of victims stems from our deep-seated belief in a just world. According to Lerner, people need to view the world as a just place in which we “get what we deserve” and “deserve what we get” - a world where hard work and clean living always pay off and where laziness and a sinful lifestyle are punished. To believe otherwise is to concede that we, too, are vulnerable to the cruel twists and turns of fate. Research suggests that the belief in a just world can help victims cope and serves as a buffer against stress. But how might this belief system influence our perception of others? If people cannot help or compensate the victims of misfortune, they turn on them. Thus, it is often assumed that poor people are lazy, that crime victims are careless, that battered wives provoke their violent and abusive husbands, and that gay men with AIDS lack moral integrity. As you might expect, cross-national comparisons reveal that people in poorer countries are less likely than those in more affluent countries to believe in a just world (Furnham, 2003).

The tendency to disparage victims may seem like just another symptoms of the fundamental attribution error: too much focus on the person and not enough on the situation. But the conditions that trigger this tendency suggest there is more to it. Studies have shown that accident victims are held more responsible for their fate when the consequences of the accident are severe rater than mild (Walster, 1966), when the victim's situation is similar to the perceiver's (Shaver, 1970), and when the perceiver is generally anxious about threats to the self (Thornton, 1992). The more threatened we feel by an apparent injustice, the greater is the need to protect ourselves from the dreadful implication that it could happen to us – an implication we defend by disparaging the victim."

Then there's faith itself:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith

"Religious faith appeals to transcendent reality, or that reality which is beyond the range of normal physical experience (e.g. the future). Transcendent reality, in this view, constitutes a realm which is off limits to material measurement and other rigors of scientific inquiry such as falsifiability and reproducibility."

Contrast with: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

And, of course, you should never mention faith without a thorough understanding of this man's contributions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Søren_Kierkegaard

Faith, by its very definition, allows for removal from reality - it allows for "justified" ignorance, prejudice, irrationality, and idiocy. Conversations simply cannot be held when one side continually hides behind centuries-old, apocryphal texts and circular reasoning.

The benefits of religion don't excuse its atrocities and allowances; life isn't a zero-sum game. If you want to believe, then by all means, believe. However, take a damned hard look at the system that's supposed to encompass and guide your life, for acceptance without thought and understanding is the worst sin of all.
 

Jordahan

World Leader of The 21st Century
Know what I don't like? Having to monitor the hell out of this thread so it doesn't turn into some gigantic [anti]religion battle.
 
I like how Jordahan and Strife liked your post so fast it's not even possible to read it in less than 15 minutes
and what i don't like is how much time you tried to make me change my mind over something i believe which is clearly i won't change my mind niter will a person who is a tiny bit pleased about his religion, when clearly you could've spent that time learning about a religion and see if it's reasonable enough for you to embrace because a person without a religion have no reason to live, why don't you go kill yourself, why are you still alive? tell me your reasons to be alive

on a side note please don't remove the post, if you want just move them to a new thread
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top