I'm with ya on that, who the hell wants affordability and performance. Not I.Atleast it isn't AMD.
AMD.
gg was close.performance.
Atleast it isn't AMD.
It doesn't matter how good their GPUs are when 90% of the games released are all amazingly optimized for the GTX series. <3 Intel btw.Erm, Sorry, but AMD are actually VERY good on their GPU side, admittedly not so much on CPU's but then again if you're against Intel you would be losing too.
Apple for gaming gg.AMD is at least honest with its consumers and very helpful towards the linux community because shockingly enough, they actually produce drivers for the linux distro's. Unlike nvidia (See Fissurez's post in other thread). Either way, Steam is doing AMD a big favour moving more towards Linux.
It doesn't matter how good their GPUs are when 90% of the games released are all amazingly optimized for the GTX series. <3 Intel btw.
Welcome to the real world.That's called uncompetitive behaviour by your glorious nVidia.
wtf, you're 14. what do you know about the "real" world?Welcome to the real world.
Well these days the issue lies more or less in the support of PhysX and nVidia happens to own it and support it 10 times better.That's called uncompetitive behaviour by your glorious nVidia.
I'd hope they support it better, since they disable running physx on gpus that aren't nvidia.Well these days the issue lies more or less in the support of PhysX and nVidia happens to own it and support it 10 times better.
It doesn't matter how good their GPUs are when 90% of the games released are all amazingly optimized for the GTX series.