TwistedShadow
Member
Lol playable =D! Imma Show ya :crysis at high settings? not playable on a 220
Lol playable =D! Imma Show ya :crysis at high settings? not playable on a 220
Lol playable =D! Imma Show ya :
that's on the absolute lowest settings, i said not playable on high settings as you said in your other post.Lol playable =D! Imma Show ya :
that's on the absolute lowest settings, i said not playable on high settings as you said in your other post.
please post a pic in game on high settings with acceptable FPS (40-50 is playable)
eeeh... i'm not understanding the logic your using.Eh, crysis is fairly old game now, Im tempted to get it just to see how well the video card runs it.
eeeh... i'm not understanding the logic your using.
budget graphic cards won't suddenly make a graphic heavy game run smooth on high settings just cause the game isn't new anymore. the 200 series is just as old as the crysis series (mind you 220 is more recent but still old) sooooooo.... uuuh...
and tbh, graphics haven't been improved at all since the first crysis and crysis warhead, wait for crysis 2 to bring it further, all the rest of the games are stuck in the cod4-mw2 era of graphics.
still does not change the fact that old cards on old games won't run better with time.Pardon me, you need to play more and better games.
do you have the cash? 595.Lol. The GTX 560 and 595 are on the verge of being unveiled. I'm also planning on running 1 16:10 19" monitor for main and two 4:3 19" monitors with all 1366x768 and up resolutions. (PREDICTION) Which is better in terms of price, performance, and power consumption: one GTX 595, or two GTX 560?
Don't rule out the Radeon 6900s!
Here's a recent article comparing the latest cards.
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2011/01/11/amd_69706950_cfx_nvidia_580570_sli_review
do you have the cash? 595.
not currently but will have in the future? 560.
either way, get the 595 if you can.