MW3 or BF3
- Thread starter Libra
- Start date
lil_maniac
Member
Whst's your choice?
Whats Whst?
Whats Whst?
MightyDeath
Member
Same *chocolate cookies* as mw2, they just nerfed different things and implemented some new things.
The only interesting thing is the campaign.
The only interesting thing is the campaign.
Propkid
Member
I was a CoD-only player since CoD4. This year I'm switching to BF3 ;/
Honestly, I can't say whether MW3 < BF3 until I don't see how does it look like on my friends' servers; they used to set up their servers really well, like disabling certain perks, killstreaks and weapons (GL) for balance.
Honestly, I can't say whether MW3 < BF3 until I don't see how does it look like on my friends' servers; they used to set up their servers really well, like disabling certain perks, killstreaks and weapons (GL) for balance.
ripperthedipper
Member
I vote for red orchestra!
Abandoned
Member
I prefer Battlefield 3. A first person shooter game isnt really complete without large maps and vehicles. I hate the fact that the CoD franchise uses the same engine with little tweaks, and makes a whole new game out of it, it's like what Apple did to the iPhone 4. Didn't really do much but make things a little better and name is iPhone 4S and advertise it EVERYWHERE.
When I was playing BF3 beta, just shooting in the rough area where the enemies are gets you teamwork points for suppression fire, don't know if that works with CoD though, where all you do is run around with stupid perks with absolutely no teamwork.
When I was playing BF3 beta, just shooting in the rough area where the enemies are gets you teamwork points for suppression fire, don't know if that works with CoD though, where all you do is run around with stupid perks with absolutely no teamwork.
Libra
Member
i totally agree with you dice updated/modified their old frostbite engine (the one used to create BFBC2 and MoH) to create this masterpiece of a game the graphics attention to detail vehicles destruction. if there are any down points to bf3 it is definitely the campaign mode its horrible to linear no freedom of choice just do this or die the campaign is so bad ill give battlefield an 8 out of 10
most 3Ds games have better graphics than Cod
sad thing about CoD is that over the year's little has changed in the game they just took MW1 and put different names on it to make more money
Propkid
Member
Got BF3 today. First impression: wtf. Buggiest game I ever played; only 1 out of 5 attempts to join a server works, game crashes randomly, dead people tend to 'freeze' and look like if they are alive, random (once per few rounds) non-latency lag.
Most of the servers are 32 or 64 people playing Conquest with or without vehicles. With vehicles the game is dead boring as only the ones that get in them get to be the game changers, without vehicles the game is full of goddamn actual campers. Respawn options suck: I either respawn up ass and run 30s to the battlefield or respawn on a squad member and get pinned down. Respawning on flag is an almost certain death to campers ;/
Ooh, and to get a sensible sniper rifle I need to play with a crappy, 3-4 shots-to-kill rifle. Shotgun is really fun though.
Hope my impression changes, cos I just ragequit after the last crash.
Most of the servers are 32 or 64 people playing Conquest with or without vehicles. With vehicles the game is dead boring as only the ones that get in them get to be the game changers, without vehicles the game is full of goddamn actual campers. Respawn options suck: I either respawn up ass and run 30s to the battlefield or respawn on a squad member and get pinned down. Respawning on flag is an almost certain death to campers ;/
Ooh, and to get a sensible sniper rifle I need to play with a crappy, 3-4 shots-to-kill rifle. Shotgun is really fun though.
Hope my impression changes, cos I just ragequit after the last crash.
